Search for: "My Name Ltd. v. Doe" Results 1 - 20 of 713
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Chijioke Okorie
First, a duly registered company does not cease to exist merely because its name ought not to have been its name. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 4:57 pm by Bryan West
It does, however, require more than mere knowledge or consent: it requires active participation. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 10:54 pm by Steve Baird
Hebei IT Shanghai ltd c/o Domain Administrator, found reverse domain name hijacking, under some rather interesting, if not questionable circumstances. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
Bloomsbury International Ltd v Sea Fish Industry Authority and DEFRA [2011] UKSC 25 has its origins in a claim brought by importers unhappy with the imposition of a levy. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The Constitution does not itself rank the rights and obligations it provides for, nor does it tell us how to divine any hierarchy. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am by chief
Fairhold Mercury Ltd v HQ (Block 1) Action Management Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 487 (LC)Fairhold (Yorkshire) Ltd v Trinity Wharf (SE16) RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 502 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 7 Sunny Gardens RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 509 (LC)No.1 Deansgate (Residential) Ltd v No.1 Deansgate RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 580 (LC)Pineview Ltd v 83 Crampton Street RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 598… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am by chief
Fairhold Mercury Ltd v HQ (Block 1) Action Management Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 487 (LC)Fairhold (Yorkshire) Ltd v Trinity Wharf (SE16) RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 502 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 7 Sunny Gardens RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 509 (LC)No.1 Deansgate (Residential) Ltd v No.1 Deansgate RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 580 (LC)Pineview Ltd v 83 Crampton Street RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 598… [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am by Eric Goldman
I previously blogged a different Pornhub ruling in my recent lengthy FOSTA roundup. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am by INFORRM
XJA v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 3174 (QB) at [15]. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
The judge does not analyse the Von Hannover case or consider the extent to which the photographs contributed to a debate of general interest. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:14 am by gmlevine
The “fact that the domain name was used in connection with an email address before any notice to Respondent of this dispute does not, at least in my opinion, necessarily support the majority’s conclusion on the bad faith element. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 9:22 pm by Barry Eagar
Case: Mantra Group Pty Ltd v Tailly Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 291This matter follows on from a previous judgement which I reported on in my post of 13 February 2010.Both parties let properties in a precinct called "Circle on Cavill". [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
The distinctive dog deviceAzumi Ltd v Zuma's Choice Pet Products Ltd [2017] EWHC 609 is a case about a dog's purpose. [read post]